I’m was
asked to write a number of more philosophical pieces on steampunk culture, so I
thought of a few subjects and here is the first one. Now, I am trying to
portray the community in a general sense, not just the views of writers and the
like. If you want their perspectives, look for the Steampunk Gazette, Vintage
Tomorrows or the Steampunk Bible. As for now, Steampunks relationship with the
Romantic Movement.
The
Romantic movement of the nineteenth century still has a great influence on our
culture today. But how can it not with known writers such as Charles Dickens,
Mary Shelly and Lord Byron. Nowadays, however, the word romantic is often
associated with sappy love stories and is often used to describe the perfect moment
in a couples relationship, but historically it’s a literary movement that
started in the wake of the Industrial and French Revolution. That is no
coincidence. First the small farmers disappeared for the country side, cities
grew out of proportion and factories started to dominate the landscape. If you
were a person born in 1740, by the end of your life you would experience
social, economic and technological whiplash. No wonder this rapid change in environment
sparked lots of protest. The capitalist model and laisse fair approach of the
government were soon contended by ideologies like Marxist Communism and the
ideals of the French Revolution that survived that survived the Napoleonic wars.
Meanwhile in the London salons writers were being inspired by the growing
economic disparity, social wrongs, but most of all change; for better or for
worse.
Change
brought new opportunities for science, market economy and expansion. All
business was booming. But while the fortunate elite raveled in in all these
advances, the poor longed for the good old days were there were no machines,
that were too competitive for the traditional crafts, and innovation wasn’t a
necessity. So the idea of a superior past grew very strong.
The Romantic movement pleaded for a return to the simple life. In their vision power and wealth corrupts while simplicity guaranties purity and goodness. . This is called the ‘blank page’ approach to human development. People do good or evil because they were taught to. Poor people steal because the evil powers that be forced them into a situation where had to in order to survive or because evil deeds were deemed good by people in power. So bad environments lead to bad people.
So who create these bad environments. There were plenty of suspects, but the people in authority got the brunt of the blame. Writers attacked traditional institutions like the church, parliament and queen of England. Apart from causing controversy by changeling authority these authors explored the human condition and the (possible) dangers of science inspired horror stories like Frankenstein. Even those day they already realized that science wasn’t the enemy, but human ambition.
The Romantic movement pleaded for a return to the simple life. In their vision power and wealth corrupts while simplicity guaranties purity and goodness. . This is called the ‘blank page’ approach to human development. People do good or evil because they were taught to. Poor people steal because the evil powers that be forced them into a situation where had to in order to survive or because evil deeds were deemed good by people in power. So bad environments lead to bad people.
So who create these bad environments. There were plenty of suspects, but the people in authority got the brunt of the blame. Writers attacked traditional institutions like the church, parliament and queen of England. Apart from causing controversy by changeling authority these authors explored the human condition and the (possible) dangers of science inspired horror stories like Frankenstein. Even those day they already realized that science wasn’t the enemy, but human ambition.
Now, I
assume it doesn’t take that much imagination to understand how Science Fiction
lead to Cyberpunk, what brought forth Steampunk. But are there still still some
remnants of the romantic ideals in Steampunk culture today?
To outsiders Steampunk seems to glorify the past. It doesn’t just focus on archaic technology, but also fashion and literature. In a technological and esthetic sense Steampunk is a critique of current feds and sleek design with little sense of uniqueness. Steamers want to give their devices and household items their own little twist, making it unique to them. Unlike the New Age, anti-materialistic inspired movements of the last twenty years, Steamers identify themselves with the objects they own. Therefore they want, maybe even need, these objects to last as long as possible rather then replace them every time a newer model is released. This translates well into the DIY-activities and items that circulate with the sub-culture. So, yes. Steampunk has a reactionary streak, just like the Romantic Movement. It, however doesn’t have the shock value that the romantics used to have. It’s weird, but Steampunk doesn’t strive to change society; Yet.
But don’t Steamers want to return to the time of the Romantics and the Industrial Revolution? Now this is the point were some of the more seasoned Steamers would yell: ‘Stop!’ The point is that Steampunk looks for inspiration in the past rather than inventing the next fed. It strives for a sense of transcending beauty that survives the ever changing sensibilities of human tastes. Therefore they often look towards Victorian designs for inspiration.
Another thing that survived past centuries is the ideals of the gentleman. It is Important to keep the ideal of the gentleman separate of the historical gentlemen of Victorian England. Unlike the cliché, Steamers in general care little for history and certainly don’t care for the injustices of the era. It pains me to say this as a historian, but most Steamer I have encountered could care less about the eighteenth century. Many can’t even tell me what the Industrial revolution is about, but they love the idea. Steampunk is about ideas, not history, no matter how much I, or others like me, want it to be. Steampunk isn’t about activism, but creativity; were I have no problem with.
To outsiders Steampunk seems to glorify the past. It doesn’t just focus on archaic technology, but also fashion and literature. In a technological and esthetic sense Steampunk is a critique of current feds and sleek design with little sense of uniqueness. Steamers want to give their devices and household items their own little twist, making it unique to them. Unlike the New Age, anti-materialistic inspired movements of the last twenty years, Steamers identify themselves with the objects they own. Therefore they want, maybe even need, these objects to last as long as possible rather then replace them every time a newer model is released. This translates well into the DIY-activities and items that circulate with the sub-culture. So, yes. Steampunk has a reactionary streak, just like the Romantic Movement. It, however doesn’t have the shock value that the romantics used to have. It’s weird, but Steampunk doesn’t strive to change society; Yet.
But don’t Steamers want to return to the time of the Romantics and the Industrial Revolution? Now this is the point were some of the more seasoned Steamers would yell: ‘Stop!’ The point is that Steampunk looks for inspiration in the past rather than inventing the next fed. It strives for a sense of transcending beauty that survives the ever changing sensibilities of human tastes. Therefore they often look towards Victorian designs for inspiration.
Another thing that survived past centuries is the ideals of the gentleman. It is Important to keep the ideal of the gentleman separate of the historical gentlemen of Victorian England. Unlike the cliché, Steamers in general care little for history and certainly don’t care for the injustices of the era. It pains me to say this as a historian, but most Steamer I have encountered could care less about the eighteenth century. Many can’t even tell me what the Industrial revolution is about, but they love the idea. Steampunk is about ideas, not history, no matter how much I, or others like me, want it to be. Steampunk isn’t about activism, but creativity; were I have no problem with.
Now many
people, not just Steamers, have this ‘romantic’ notion of Victorian values and
behavior between gentlemen and ladies that is inspired by the works of
Charlotte Brontë and similar writers and less by gritty fiction such as Gangs
of New York. These ideals are somewhat reflected within the community itself.
Ask a random Steamer how they feel about the current society, and you have a
good chance they’ll say something like. ‘Society is unfair and people are
cogholes towards each other.’ Now scientific investigation and statistics have
proven the opposite. The world has never been this peaceful, people have never
been this equal and violence has never been this low. Now this doesn’t mean the
present is perfect, but humanity has made great strides since the nineteenth
century. A matter affect, we are still trying to wash the stains of that time
out of our moral fabric, like the notion racial superiority, laisses faire
economics, nationalism, imperialism and I could go on. This that were being
questioned by the Romantics of that era. But like I said Steamers don’t care
about history, but the idea of a better time were people cared more about their,
personal and modern values. So all these things don’t matter to them and it is
unfair to force these issues down the throats of these people (as long they are
not activists). In this context it’s (science) fiction, not history. So blaming
steamers for Victorian perceptions about slavery and race is like blaming
trekies for the negative depiction of Klingons. To paraphrase Rob Brown, ‘I
would like to have born in a past that never existed.’
To
summaries. Steampunk has been inspired by the Romantic Movement, but Steampunk found
it’s own way into the twenty-first century. Rather than romanticizing the past
it created it’s own canon based on a fictional past, without turning it into
political bulletpoints. Like the Romantics, it is a reaction to contemporary
grievances, but it focuses more on the lack of individuality and the
wastefulness of our current economic models and aesthetics. So it’s community
is more focused on escapism and creativity rather than activism. This doesn’t
mean there aren’t any Steampunk activists, but they aren’t an organized
movement in to itself. Therefore, when Steamers are asked, ‘why do you do this?
They’ll reply with: ‘For fun’.
Please let know you think I'm right? Don't forget to give my posts a like and I've you have a suggestion or have a story of your own. Please contact me.